Attachment theory is all about understanding the bonds we form with others, especially between children and their caregivers. However, since then attachment theory has grown to explain not just childhood bonds but also how these early experiences affect adult relationships.
Let’s look at the origins and evolution of attachment theory:
Bowlby believed that forming attachments was a natural part of being human, like a survival instinct. Babies are born with a need to connect with caregivers because these bonds help them feel safe and secure. Bowlby noticed that children who were separated from their parents experienced significant distress, which led him to think more deeply about the importance of these early relationships.
Bowlby argued that a strong emotional and physical bond to at least one primary caregiver was crucial for development. His work laid the groundwork for understanding the importance of early relationships in a child’s emotional and social development.
Around the same time as Bowlby’s theory became prominent, psychologist Harry Harlow conducted his famous experiments with rhesus monkeys.
Harlow’s experiments with monkeys showed that warmth and comfort were just as important as food when it came to forming attachments. Baby monkeys preferred to spend time with a soft, comforting surrogate mother rather than a wire one that provided food.
These findings highlighted the importance of comfort and emotional warmth in attachment, supporting Bowlby’s ideas that attachment wasn’t just about feeding but also about emotional connection
Ainsworth expanded on Bowlby’s ideas by conducting the “Strange Situation” experiment. This study observed how babies reacted when their mothers left them alone in a room and then returned.
Through this research, Ainsworth identified three primary attachment styles: secure, anxious-ambivalent, and anxious-avoidant. Her work provided empirical support for Bowlby’s theories and introduced the idea that the quality of attachment could vary significantly between individuals.
Later on, a fourth style, disorganized attachment, was added by other researchers.
In the 1980s, researchers Mary Main and Judith Solomon identified a fourth attachment style, known as disorganized attachment.
They found that some children did not fit into the existing categories and exhibited a mix of behaviors, often linked to inconsistent or frightening behavior from caregivers. This addition highlighted the complexity of attachment and its impact on behavior, especially in cases of trauma or neglect.
Main and her colleagues also developed the Adult Attachment Interview, which explored how early attachment styles influence adult relationships.
Their research found that adult attachment styles of parents are often related to the attachment patterns observed in their children.
For example, secure parents are more likely to have securely attached children, while dismissing or preoccupied parents may have children with corresponding insecure attachment styles. These findings highlight the intergenerational transmission of attachment patterns and the importance of understanding adult attachment for promoting healthy relationships across generations.
Attachment theory has continued to evolve, extending beyond childhood to explore how early attachments affect adult relationships and behaviour.
Modern adult attachment theory explores why some adults feel secure in their relationships while others struggle with insecurity. Researchers R. Chris Fraley and Glenn I. Roisman have provided valuable insights through longitudinal studies.
One of the main takeaways from their research is that while early caregiving experiences play a role in shaping attachment styles, they aren’t the whole story. The connection between early experiences and adult attachment is not always clear-cut or consistent. This means that while childhood influences matter, they don’t completely dictate how we form attachments as adults.
Fraley and Roisman also point out that our attachment styles are influenced by both socialization and personal traits. Early experiences with caregivers are important, but so are the ways in which we interpret others’ actions and handle our own emotions. This interplay means that our environment and inherent characteristics both shape our attachment patterns, and these patterns can change over time.
Bowlby’s theory has been integrated with other psychological frameworks, such as Erik Erikson’s stages of development, to understand its impact throughout the lifespan. Modern research continues to explore the nuances of attachment, including cross-cultural studies and interventions to support healthy attachment formation.
Since the 1950s, research in psychology has extensively explored the concept of attachment, leading to the identification of four generally accepted attachment style categories.
These attachment styles—secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganized—describe distinct patterns of behaviour and emotional response in relationships.
People with a secure attachment style feel confident in their relationships, comfortable with closeness, and trust their partners. They have positive self-views and maintain a healthy balance between intimacy and independence. They communicate effectively and handle conflicts constructively.
Let’s look at some of the benefits and disadvantages of having a secure attachment style:
Morticia Addams displays some of the most prominent traits of someone with a secure attachment style. Emotionally stable, open to intimacy, confident, and communicates effectively in her relationship.
Individuals with an avoidant-dismissive attachment style keep their emotional distance, have a positive self-view, and downplay the importance of relationships. They often struggle with intimacy, appearing emotionally detached and self-sufficient, avoiding reliance on others.
Miranda displays some of the most prominent traits of someone with a avoidant / dismissive attachment style. Detached, self-reliant, avoids vulnerability, and prioritizes work over personal connections.
Those with an anxious-ambivalent attachment style crave intimacy but are often insecure about others’ responses and fear rejection. They tend to have a negative self-view and constantly seek reassurance from their partners. Their relationships can be emotionally intense, with frequent worries about their partner’s commitment.
Bella displays some of the most prominent traits of someone with a anxious attachment style. Preoccupied with relationships, seeking constant reassurance, fearful of abandonment, and often insecure.
Disorganized attachment is marked by inconsistent and often frightening behavior from caregivers, leading to a lack of a coherent attachment strategy. This style is linked to higher risks of social, cognitive difficulties, and psychopathology. People with this style might show contradictory behaviors, seeking closeness while also displaying fear or resistance.
Anakin displays signs of a disorganized attachment style, such as unpredictable behavior, difficulty regulating emotions, and a mix of fear and desire for connection.
Attachment styles develop in early childhood based on the caregiver’s responsiveness and interactions with the infant. Consistent and nurturing caregiving fosters secure attachment, while inconsistent or neglectful caregiving can lead to insecure attachment styles.
Yes, experiencing a negative or abusive relationship can alter one’s attachment style. Such experiences can increase attachment anxiety or avoidance, potentially transforming a secure attachment style into an insecure one.
Disorganized attachment is often considered the most unhealthy due to its strong association with later emotional, social difficulties, and psychopathology. It can lead to severe relational problems, making it crucial to address in therapy.
Secure attachment typically leads to higher satisfaction and trust in relationships. In contrast, anxious and avoidant attachment styles are linked to more negative emotions and lower satisfaction. Anxious individuals might experience clinginess and fear of abandonment, while avoidant individuals often struggle with intimacy and emotional expression.
Yes, attachment style can influence how individuals express and interpret love languages.
The 5 Love Languages theory was developed by Dr. Gary Chapman, a marriage counselor and author. The concept is presented in his book “The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts,” first published in 1992. According to Chapman, people have different ways of expressing and receiving love, which he categorizes into five distinct “languages”:
Words of Affirmation: Using words to express love and appreciation, such as compliments, verbal encouragement, and affirming statements.
Acts of Service: Performing actions to show care and support, such as helping with chores, running errands, or doing something thoughtful for the other person.
Receiving Gifts: Giving and receiving tangible items that convey thoughtfulness and affection, no matter the monetary value.
Quality Time: Spending meaningful time together, giving undivided attention, and engaging in activities that foster connection and intimacy.
Physical Touch: Expressing love through physical contact, such as hugging, holding hands, kissing, and other forms of affectionate touch.
Chapman’s theory suggests that understanding and speaking your partner’s primary love language can enhance communication and strengthen the relationship.
Let’s look at how your attachment style may be influencing your love language:
Individuals with a secure attachment style typically feel comfortable with emotional closeness and depend on their partners in healthy ways. They tend to appreciate all love languages but might have a stronger preference for verbal and emotional expressions like words of affirmation and quality time.
People with this attachment style often struggle with intimacy and emotional closeness due to past experiences of neglect or emotional unavailability from caregivers. They may prefer love languages that don't require deep emotional engagement, such as acts of service or physical touch, which can be perceived as less emotionally demanding
Those with an anxious attachment style often seek reassurance and fear abandonment. They may heavily rely on love languages that provide constant affirmation of love and presence, such as quality time and words of affirmation. These expressions help alleviate their anxiety about the relationship
This style often results from inconsistent or traumatic caregiving. Individuals with disorganized attachment may exhibit fluctuating preferences for love languages, sometimes needing intense closeness and at other times distancing themselves. Their response to love languages can be inconsistent, reflecting their internal conflict and unpredictability.
Chapman’s theory suggests that understanding and speaking your partner’s primary love language can enhance communication and strengthen the relationship.
The Love Types Theory, conceptualized by John Lee in his 1973 book “The Colors of Love,” categorizes romantic love into different styles to help understand the diverse ways people experience and express love. Lee uses the metaphor of primary and secondary colors to describe the combinations and complexities of love styles.
He categorizes love into 6 different categories:
Research has shown that different attachment styles predict preferences for various love types.
Securely attached individuals tend to prefer Eros (passionate love), while those with insecure attachment styles lean towards Ludus (game-playing love), Pragma (practical love), and Mania (obsessive love).
Eros Love is characterized by romantic, passionate love rooted in physical attraction and an intense emotional connection. Eros lovers are drawn to each other by a powerful physical and emotional bond, seeking to share everything with their beloved. This type of love is often seen in the early stages of a relationship, where everything about the partner seems perfect, and there is a strong urge to merge both emotionally and physically. Eros is all about idealization and the pursuit of a perfect union, marked by deep, sensual desire and longing for closeness.
Ludus Love is playful, non-committal love focused on fun and enjoyment rather than serious commitment. Ludus lovers treat love as a game, often involving multiple partners and flirtation. They seek excitement and pleasure without the intention of forming long-term attachments. For Ludus lovers, the thrill of the chase and the excitement of new experiences are more important than stability and commitment. This type of love emphasizes light-heartedness and spontaneity, often avoiding the deeper emotional investment found in other love styles.
Storge Love (or Storgic Love) is a love that develops slowly out of friendship and is based on similar interests and a deep sense of companionship. Storge lovers often form long-term, committed relationships built on mutual respect, trust, and affection. This type of love grows gradually and is typically stable and enduring, characterized by a deep emotional bond that strengthens over time. Storge is more about shared values and experiences, providing a solid foundation for a lasting relationship.
Pragma Love is practical and logical, based on mutual benefits, compatibility, and long-term goals. Pragma lovers approach relationships with a rational mindset, focusing on shared values, life goals, and practical considerations such as financial stability and family background. This type of love is built on reason and practicality, often involving a careful selection process to find a partner who fits well into one's life plan. Pragma love emphasizes long-term stability and partnership, valuing the functional aspects of a relationship over romantic idealization.
Mania Love is obsessive and possessive, marked by intense emotional highs and lows. Mania lovers experience a powerful need for reciprocation and reassurance, often leading to jealousy and dependency. This type of love can create instability and emotional turmoil, as the lover's intense emotions can fluctuate dramatically. The need for constant affirmation and the fear of losing the beloved can dominate the relationship, making it difficult for Mania lovers to maintain a sense of emotional balance. This love style is often characterized by dramatic and passionate expressions of love but also by the potential for emotional distress.
Agape Love is selfless, unconditional love that is altruistic and giving, without expecting anything in return. Agape lovers prioritize their partner’s well-being and happiness above their own, often exhibiting a deep sense of self-sacrifice and devotion. This type of love is considered the highest and purest form of love, emphasizing the importance of care, concern, and support for the beloved without any selfish motives. Agape love is about nurturing and cherishing the partner, providing unwavering support and kindness regardless of the circumstances.
To determine your attachment style, you can assess patterns of behaviour and attitudes in close relationships through self-report measures or interviews. Reflecting on past and present relationships can offer insights into your attachment tendencies.
Take the quiz below to find our what your attachment style is:
Yes, attachment styles can change over time with therapy, self-awareness, and positive relationship experiences. Developing secure attachment behaviours and working through past insecurities can lead to more fulfilling and stable relationships.
Reprogramming an attachment style typically involves therapy focusing on developing secure attachment behaviours and addressing underlying insecurities. This may include cognitive-behavioural therapy, mindfulness practices, and relationship coaching to foster healthier attachment patterns.
Here are some practical techniques you can use to start changing your attachment style:
Reflect on Past Relationships: Take time to journal or think about past relationships, noting patterns and emotional responses. Understanding these patterns can provide insights into your attachment style.
Identify Triggers: Recognize situations or behaviors that trigger anxiety or avoidance. Being aware of these can help in managing responses.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT can help in understanding and changing negative thought patterns related to attachment.
Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT): EFT focuses on improving emotional responses and building secure attachments in relationships.
Mindfulness-Based Therapy: Practices like mindfulness can help increase emotional regulation and present-moment awareness, reducing anxiety associated with insecure attachment styles
Seek Supportive Relationships: Surround yourself with people who exhibit secure attachment behaviours. Positive relationship experiences can help in reshaping attachment styles.
Communicate Needs Clearly: Practice expressing your needs and feelings openly and constructively. This can foster trust and security in relationships.
Practice Mindfulness and Meditation: Regular mindfulness meditation can help in becoming more aware of emotional states and managing them effectively.
Learn Relaxation Techniques: Techniques such as deep breathing and progressive muscle relaxation can help in reducing anxiety and promoting calmness.
Take Small Risks in Relationships: Gradually open up to others and take emotional risks, like sharing feelings or asking for support, to build trust over time.
Set Small, Achievable Goals: Start with small interactions that challenge your attachment style and gradually increase their complexity as comfort grows.
Read Books on Attachment Theory: Books like “Attached” by Amir Levine and Rachel Heller can provide insights into attachment styles and ways to develop a secure attachment.
Attend Workshops or Courses: Participate in workshops focused on relationship skills and attachment to gain practical knowledge and support.
Develop a Positive Self-View: Work on self-acceptance and self-love by recognizing your strengths and accomplishments.
Be Patient with Yourself: Change takes time, and setbacks are normal. Approach yourself with kindness and understanding.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x
Chapman, G. D. (2010). The five love languages. Walker Large Print.
Chopik, W. J., Edelstein, R. S., & Grimm, K. J. (2019). Longitudinal changes in attachment orientation over a 59-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000167
Dinero, R. E., Conger, R. D., Shaver, P. R., Widaman, K. F., & Larsen-Rife, D. (2008). Influence of family of origin and adult romantic partners on romantic attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012506
Feeney, J., & Noller, P. (1991). Attachment style and verbal descriptions of romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082003
Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13(12), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047884
Harlow, H. F., & Zimmerman, R. R. (1959). The development of affectional responses in infant monkeys. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103(5), 501–509.
Lee, J. A. (1973). Colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press. https://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn2131317
Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press.
Leszczynski, J. P. (2021). History of attachment theory. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1352
Şahin, S. M., & Çoksan, S. (2020, March 14). The relationship between attachment styles, love types, emotional expression, and life satisfaction. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vqw9d
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.). (2015). Attachment theory and research: New directions and emerging themes. Guilford Press.
Wittenberg University. (2020). Love languages poster. https://www.wittenberg.edu/sites/default/files/media/celebrationoflearning/2020Virtual/LoveLanguagesPoster.pdf
Disclaimer: All articles are reviewed and edited for quality control by a HPCSA Registered Counsellor. However, this content is intended to be used for educational and/or entertainment purposes and should not be taken as medical advice. Please reach out to a medical professional if you have concerns regarding your mental health.
Exploring the intricacies of trauma, this guide delves into the myriad responses our bodies and minds exhibit when faced with distressing experiences, categorizing them into the widely recognized “fight, flight, freeze, or fawn” responses.
Wondering what PMB is and whether you can access it for your Mental Health? Let’s look at the benefits and the downfalls of utilizing your PMB benefits.
Wondering whether there is a connection between your periods and mental health? The answer is yes! Let’s look at your menstrual cycle hormones
